On October 7 the
House of Commons passed an Alliance Party motion that Parliament
should assign a portion of the federal gasoline tax to municipal governments.
Even many Liberals
supported it, which is why it passed.
Consider it a sign
of things to come. Paul Martin, our imminent prime minister, has been
courting big-city support.
At a conference in
Winnipeg on May 29, Martin spoke vaguely about a "new deal for
municipalities, both large and small" from the federal
government. He said, for example, that a portion of the federal
gasoline tax should go directly to municipal infrastructure projects,
as long as provinces match it.
Which, when you
think about it, is exactly how Ottawa suckered the provinces on
medicare and pensions in the 1960s. It promised them money in
exchange for control, then withdrew the money and kept the control.
Before Alberta's
mayors, reeves and alderpersons get too excited about the prospect of
new federal cash, they should ask themselves a simple question.
Why is Ottawa
allowed to tax gasoline at all?
The whole point is
to pay for roads. But according to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation,
Ottawa rebates less than 3% of the $5 billion a year it collects in
gasoline taxes--and virtually all of that 3% goes to the Atlantic
provinces and Quebec.
(No wonder almost
all the country roads on Prince Edward Island are paved, and most of
Alberta's are not.)
As for provincial
governments "matching" it, they already do.
Would it not make
more sense for each province to tax its own people and build its own
roads, and for Ottawa to vacate the field entirely? That would leave
$5 billion more per year in provincial economies for streets and highways.
Here, alas, we
come to the real rub in federal politics.
Only three
provinces are net-payers into the federal system--Alberta massively,
Ontario moderately, and B.C. very slightly. The others are all net
takers--they get more back from Ottawa overall than they put in.
So, when the
premiers sit around a table discussing the federal gasoline tax, all
ten know that Ottawa isn't spending it on roads, but seven actually
don't care. They'll be thinking of all the other federal transfers,
grants and programs they get that the federal gas tax helps pay for.
So why reduce it?
This has been
going on for half a century. Ottawa now intrudes into all kinds of
areas in which it has no constitutional mandate--medicare, education,
local roads and sewers, culture, job creation, pensions, environment
and housing. In every case, it bribes/bullies the provinces to let it in.
And the provinces
(including Alberta) play along, sometimes uttering ritual protests
but always taking whatever federal money is on offer, and complaining
that it isn't enough.
As a result,
Albertans pay some $10 billion more into federal coffers each year
than they get back in federal spending. That's 7% of GDP. In simpler
terms, it's $9,000 per Alberta household. Annually.
So the next time
you hit a pothole, don't think about Paul Martin and his "new
partnership." It will amount to peanuts.
Think instead
about the $10 billion that Ottawa siphons out of our province each year.
The solution is
not to increase what Ottawa sends us. We can't win at that game. The
only answer is to reduce what Ottawa takes.
- Link Byfield
Link Byfield is
chairman of the Edmonton-based Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy.
"Just
Between Us" is a feature service of the Citizens Centre for
Freedom and Democracy. The purpose of the Citizens Centre is to
improve the quality of life for all Canadians by promoting policies
that foster individual initiative and personal responsibility.