Seated with his
usual composure in a crowded Edmonton courtroom last Friday was the
criminally accused, former Sergeant-at Arms Oscar Lacombe.
The sad irony is
that for 13 years Lacombe was chief of Legislature security and
protected Alberta's politicians. But when their turn came to protect
him, they failed.
Lacombe is a war
veteran of Korea and the Suez crisis, a Metis, and has a
distinguished track record. He has guts, too.
Last January 1,
the date when Ottawa's idiotic billion-dollar rifle registry took
legal effect, Lacombe held a press conference at a site overlooking
the legislature. He arrived carrying an ancient unregistered .22
rifle, heavily sealed in plastic, and without firing bolt or bullets.
It could not have
shot anyone.
To allay
unnecessary fears, Lacombe had met two days earlier with Edmonton's
deputy police chief and explained exactly what he would do, when,
where, why and how. (Police testified in court that they had "no
concerns" about the event posing a danger to anyone.)
Lacombe made a
short speech denouncing the rifle registry and inviting Ottawa to
charge him. Police later confiscated his useless firearm, and, months
afterward, charged him under the Criminal Code.
Here we get to the
Alberta government's sneaky little treachery.
The new rifle
registry is established by the federal Firearms Act, and many of its
enforcement provisions blatantly violate fundamental legal rights. A
few of its less questionable parts (in particular the registration
requirement itself) were also added to the Criminal Code.
Lacombe had hoped
to be charged by the federal government under the Firearms Act, so he
could test it against the Charter of Rights.
However, the feds
never charge under the Firearms Act, assuming it to be a dead duck if
Charter-challenged. They enforce under it, but charge under the
Criminal Code. But this requires the cooperation of provincial
governments, because the Constitution gives provinces control of
prosecuting criminal law--something the Alberta government (among
others) has said all along it will not do.
A memo
to this effect went to police and prosecutors across Alberta on
December 9, 1998 from assistant deputy minister of justice Ken
Tjosvold, stating, "Justice Canada [the feds] will be expected
to prosecute all new regulatory offences under the Firearms Act
whenever possible. In any case where a similar charge could be laid
under either the Criminal Code or under the Firearms Act, it is
expected that a charge under the Firearms Act will be laid."
In other words,
let Ottawa do its own dirty work.
Big talk.
Alberta's Tory politicians have been preening themselves for five
years with rhetoric like this, claiming that they will leave
prosecution to the feds.
Well, they ARE
prosecuting it, even though they don't have to, even though they said
they wouldn't, and even though their duplicity shelters Ottawa's
Firearms Act from a Charter challenge.
In the process,
they will trash the brave gesture of a 75-year-old war veteran who
depended upon them to stick to their word.
Instead, our
spineless provincial government has brought in (or allowed in) a
charge under the Criminal Code, and borrowed a federal prosecutor
(Michelle Doyle) to obscure the fact that they are in fact
cooperating with Ottawa.
It is beneath
contempt. It's an outrage.
The trial was
adjourned until December 15. It would be helpful, meanwhile, if
citizens from across Canada told Ralph Klein to drop the charges
against Oscar Lacombe and force the feds to expose their precious
registry to Charter justice.
Ralph's office
number is 780-427-2251. His e-mail address is premier@gov.ab.ca
- Link Byfield
Link Byfield is
chairman of the Edmonton-based Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy.
"Just
Between Us" is a feature service of the Citizens Centre for
Freedom and Democracy. The purpose of the Citizens Centre is to
improve the quality of life for all Canadians by promoting policies
that foster individual initiative and personal responsibility.