Premier Ralph
Klein last Saturday appointed a task force of Tory MLAs to look into
what's called the "Alberta Agenda"--the idea that Alberta
should reclaim all the fields that belong to it under the Canadian Constitution.
If it does, there
will be an Alberta Pension Plan instead of the Canada Pension Plan,
Alberta Provincial Police instead of the RCMP, and provincial
personal income tax will be collected from Edmonton instead of Ottawa.
For the most part,
provinces (except Quebec) have entrusted these operations to federal
management, and can take them back.
The Alberta Agenda
could also include a much tougher stance towards Ottawa on disputed
jurisdictions like health, environment, grain marketing, marriage
licensing and gun control. In all of these matters Ralph's government
talks tough but never follows through.
To a lot of people
the Alberta Agenda comes right out of left field (much like Senate
reform did in the early 1980s). "Huh?" they ask.
"What's wrong with the Mounties? What's wrong with the CPP?"
Actually, there's
a LOT wrong with the Mounties and the CPP, and everything else on the
Alberta Agenda list.
But you have to go
one item at a time. Let's start with the Canada Pension Plan.
The CPP is a
terrible, terrible program. Young people will recover at best 60
percent of what Ottawa forces them to contribute, while people now
retired are getting out far more than they put in. The CPP is a
wealth transfer, not a pension.
For Alberta to opt
out, it must offer a comprehensive public plan that works the same
way and does the same things as the CPP. A privatized alternative
plan, though it would be better, would not qualify.
Nonetheless, an
APP would at least be cheaper than the CPP, according to a newly
updated study by William Robson of the C.D.Howe Institute.
Alberta, because
of its business-friendly and family-friendly culture, maintains over
the long term a higher-than-average proportion of young, working
families, and could cut its pension premium by 15% to produce the
same level of benefits as the CPP. That would save the average
working family $500 a year (and also help nurture Alberta's distinct society).
The only apparent
down-side of an Alberta Pension Plan is political, not economic. If
Albertans quit the CPP, they'll take with them about $2 billion they
now pay in surplus CPP contributions. As a result, while their rate
would drop to about 8.5% of earnings (from the present national rate
of 9.9), the rate paid by other Canadians could nudge above 10%.
I suspect Ralph
fears this would put Alberta (and him) in a bad light. He'd be called
names by those tiresome people who still think of Canada as
"compassionate" because it has "universal national
social programs" like the CPP.
Of course, only a
very anglo-centric person would consider the CPP "national"
(Quebec stayed out of it); and only an economic illiterate would
consider an indiscriminate transfer of earnings from poor young
people to rich retirees "compassionate."
However, the feds
wouldn't really have to raise CPP premiums above 10%, even if Alberta
does pull out. Instead, they could redirect to the CPP a small
fraction of the billions they squander each year on the gun registry,
canoe museums in Shawinigan, regional development grants that don't
develop the regions, aboriginal grants that don't get past the local
chief and council, federal advertising contracts, and a hundred other things.
If an Alberta
Pension Plan forced Ottawa to reorder its spending priorities, it
would benefit all Canadians.
- Link Byfield
Link Byfield is
chairman of the Edmonton-based Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy.
"Just
Between Us" is a feature service of the Citizens Centre for
Freedom and Democracy. The purpose of the Citizens Centre is to
improve the quality of life for all Canadians by promoting policies
that foster individual initiative and personal responsibility.