Like most people,
I don't hate the CBC. I just don't watch it. And I resent paying for it.
It costs each
taxpayer across the country $50 a year to keep Peter Mansbridge
delivering his patronizing, left-liberal bromides each night, whether
we want them or not.
According to a
story in the National Post this week, the CBC has discovered through
an internal study that a great many of us (it didn't disclose how
many) find the public network stuffy, arrogant and biased.
CBC
editor-in-chief Tony Burman rejoined that the public think all media
are biased, not just the CBC.
The big
difference, however, is that nobody is forced to pay for the bias of
Global and CTV, just the CBC's.
Unfortunately, at
this point the debate always slides into a stalemate between those
who would give the network more money, so it can be more
sanctimonious and CBCish than ever, and those who want it sold off.
We should find a
more constructive solution.
The question is
whether there are legitimate national television needs apart from the
consumer market served by private broadcasters.
I would say that
in a country as fragmented as ours there plainly are. The hard part
is figuring out how to fill them. The CBC certainly doesn't. It is
merely the private communications network of our tax-funded governing
class, of which the CBC itself is a charter member. As such it is not
a "public" broadcaster at all.
If private
broadcasters answer to the advertisers, to whom does the CBC account?
Not to the state. It is (quite properly) protected from political
interference. And not to the public, for we are forced to pay for it
even though must of us refuse to watch it. The answer is, to nobody.
It is a sealed corporate culture, self-selecting, self-perpetuating
and self-serving.
As a result it is
snotty, preachy, predictable, unsympathetic and dull.
If the CBC is ever
to become a "public" broadcaster it must become accountable
in some way to the public.
Suppose, for a
moment, that the national government shifted the CBC to a funding
formula which was one-third public donations and only two-thirds tax-funding.
A notice appears on tax forms explaining that for every dollar it
gets in tax-deductible donations, the CBC gets two more from the
government. And that's all it gets.
A formula of this
sort, phased in over five or six years, would force the CBC to canvas
high and low for public interest subjects and audiences--on the left,
on the right, in the biggest cities and in the remotest regions.
For every David
Suzuki yammering about "climate change" we'd get at least
one Tim Ball refuting it. For every Naomi Klein calling us to the WTO
barricades we'd get a Michael Walker calling us to our senses. It
would be as right-wing as it is left-wing, as regional as it is
urban, as pragmatic as it is artsy.
For this I'd
willingly toss in about $100 a year, instead of $50 unwillingly. Add
the matching government grant and it's $300.
If by appealing to
individuals, churches, business and professional groups and nonprofit
organizations, across the spectrum and across the country, they can
build a strong national audience, well and good.
And if they can't,
why are they there?Now comes the moment of truth.
- Link Byfield
Link Byfield is
chairman of the Edmonton-based Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy.
"Just
Between Us" is a feature service of the Citizens Centre for
Freedom and Democracy. The purpose of the Citizens Centre is to
improve the quality of life for all Canadians by promoting policies
that foster individual initiative and personal responsibility.