For democracy to
work, citizens need honest, accurate information from governments.
And it's amazing how often we don't get it.
Politicians seem
to feel entitled to mislead people whenever it suits their agenda.
And it isn't just eastern Liberals, it happens right here at home in
Alberta with our Conservative government.
Last year, for
example, after promising up and down since 1998 that it would not
enforce the federal Firearms Act, the Alberta government turned out
to be doing just that against gun registry protester Oscar Lacombe.
When called to
account, they first denied they were doing it.
Then they admitted
they were doing it, but claimed they had no choice. That wasn't true either.
Well, now they're
claiming it would be illegal for Alberta to unilaterally withdraw
from the Canada Pension Plan to create an Alberta Pension Plan.
This isn't true,
but they hope by saying it they can kill the idea.
Last winter, over
700 citizens went to great efforts to address a committee of Alberta
MLAs looking at strengthening Alberta's role in Confederation.
Many, perhaps
most, of the presenters favored creating an Alberta Pension Plan as
an alternative to the Canada Pension Plan. Not only would Albertans
save substantial sums of money with a provincial plan, it would send
a loud and clear message they are fed up with Ottawa.
Unfortunately, the
Alberta government resists this idea, even though their own
consultant's study in 1999 found it would make economic sense. The
government thinks it would be politically difficult.
Last Wednesday,
the MLA committee issued its report. On page 19, the committee states
as a fact that Alberta can't legally withdraw from the CPP without
the consent of two-thirds of the participating provinces -- consent
the other provinces probably won't give.
This is not true.
Alberta can withdraw unilaterally from the CPP on three years' notice
if it sets up a parallel plan. It doesn't need permission from
anyone, not even Ottawa.
The committee
knows this. It is quite clear in section 3 of the Canada Pension Plan
Act, and confirmed by section 94A of the Canadian Constitution. But
the committee said we need permission. It lied. Why? To kill the
growing public pressure for Alberta to opt out of the CPP.
The committee
gives the game away on page 15 of its report by saying Alberta should
not pick fights with Ottawa, it should cooperate and collaborate with
the federal government.
The committee is
within its rights to recommend a softball approach, even though all
it ever produces in Ottawa is laughter. (The only province that has
earned federal respect is Quebec, which plays hardball on provincial rights.)
But that's not the
point. The committee is not entitled to lie to Albertans. Not only is
it wrong, on this question it compromises our constitutional rights.
If you'd like to
send an e-mail demanding that the government tell the truth, visit www.citizenscentre.com.
- Link Byfield
Link Byfield is
chairman of the Edmonton-based Citizens Centre for Freedom and Democracy.
"Just
Between Us" is a feature service of the Citizens Centre for
Freedom and Democracy. The purpose of the Citizens Centre is to
improve the quality of life for all Canadians by promoting policies
that foster individual initiative and personal responsibility.

www.citizenscentre.com