Citizens Centre
for Freedom and Democracy
WEEKLY COMMENTARY
"Just
Between Us"
December 20, 2004
Gay marriage
is a constitutional change and should be put to a referendum
Back we go to
homosexual marriage, with a vengeance.
And I mean
vengeance. The "tolerance" vigilantes are already out in force.
For example,
Graham Thomson, one of Canwest's loopier columnists, has denounced
Ralph Klein's call for a national referendum as "fanning the
flames of public outrage," and leading a parade for bigots to
burn down gays' houses.
Thomson also
voices the strange, ignorant idea that if we allow democratic
majorities to settle matters of minority rights, there will be no
minority rights.
In fact, in Canada
and elsewhere, all significant minority rights--from women's right to
vote, to the gays' right to have sex, to the institution of human
rights commissions--were bestowed by democratic majorities who saw
wisdom in the proposals.
If not from
democratic majorities, where does Thomson imagine these things came
from? The Canwest editorial board? It makes you wonder what he was
doing in history class. Not thinking, obviously.
But enough about
Thomson and his ilk. Until they learn to stop ascribing ugly motives
to everyone who disagrees with them, they are incapable of
intelligent discussion.
It looks like Paul
Martin will bring his gay marriage amendment into Parliament in early
February, and will shove it through as fast as possible.
Even the most
optimistic conservatives I know think this Martin bill will probably
pass. Martin is forcing his cabinet ministers to support it, and Jack
Layton is forcing his whole caucus to vote the party line. (More
liberation brought to you by the New Democracy.)
So what about
Ralph Klein's proposal for a national referendum?
Well,
notwithstanding the more hysterical pronouncements of some in the
media, it makes sense.
Let's start with
the fact that instituting homosexual marriage effects a significant
change to our Constitution. It radically alters our legal
understanding of the most basic unit in Canadian society, and impacts
the constitutional rights of the provinces.
In its recent
reference decision, the Supreme Court acknowledged both these points.
Note also that the
Court did NOT say Parliament must institute homosexual marriage, only
that it may if it chooses.
In other words,
the Court has said it's for a democratic majority to decide.
It doesn't matter
how often federal Justice Minister Irwin Cotler lies to the TV
cameras. As with abortion, the Supreme Court says it's a democratic decision.
Now you may recall
that the last time Parliament wanted to change the Constitution, with
the Charlottetown Accord, it put the question to a direct vote by all Canadians.
This was only
common sense. The Constitution belongs to the people of Canada, and
they should have the final say over what's in it.
Canadians should
therefore appeal to Martin's better instincts (because unlike
Chretien, Martin actually seems to have a conscience) to allow the
whole country to decide this issue.
And if Martin
refuses, Canadians should appeal to the Governor General not to give
Royal Assent to Martin's bill until it has first been approved by the
people, as is their proper right.
Believe it or not,
the governor-general has the constitutional power. And Adrienne
Clarkson is imperious enough, and angry enough at the House of
Commons, that a mass appeal from the people might convince her to use it.
Regardless, Ralph
Klein is right. Only by a national referendum can this issue now be settled.
- Link Byfield
Link Byfield is
chairman of the Edmonton-based Citizens Centre for Freedom and
Democracy, and an Alberta senator-elect.
"Just
Between Us" is a feature service of the Citizens Centre for
Freedom and Democracy. The purpose of the Citizens Centre is to
enhance freedom and democracy by enabling ordinary citizens to become
active and effective on important issues outside the normal processes
of party politics.

www.citizenscentre.com